Quick answer
Price audit/implementation/maintenance separately, or phase by savings/outcomes. Reporting automation needs consistent metric definitions before refresh cadence.
Why it matters
One fixed price for everything loses to scope creep.
Inconsistent definitions = bad decisions.
Step by step
- Map the current workflow: trigger/inputs/steps/owner/exceptions/output.
- Measure frequency/hours/error cost and pick one workflow worth automating.
- Build a minimal loop with human review/rollback.
- Add monitoring/logs/permissions; run two weeks before expanding.
- Calculate real ROI including implementation/maintenance.
Common mistakes
- Automating a bad process.
- Ignoring exceptions/human review.
- No monitoring/owner.
- Counting time saved but not implementation/maintenance.
Checklist
- Workflow/trigger/exceptions/owner mapped.
- ROI includes implementation/maintenance/error costs.
- Minimal loop + human review + rollback.
- Permissions/keys/logs/redaction.
- Monitoring/owner/review cadence.
Key facts
- Inconsistent definitions = bad decisions.
- Alert on anomalies.
FAQ
How should Reporting automation be priced?
Price audit/implementation/maintenance separately, or phase by savings/outcomes. Reporting automation needs consistent metric definitions before refresh cadence.
How long does it take?
Usually 1-3 minutes; for intermittent issues, run 30 seconds and retest elsewhere.
Is data uploaded?
Runs locally and does not upload video/audio; extensions may still read the page.
Source: Looker